Home / Business / The 3-Month Rule: My Technical Framework for Doing Things That Don’t Scale Variation 198

The 3-Month Rule: My Technical Framework for Doing Things That Don’t Scale Variation 198

Embracing the 3-Month Rule: A Tactical Approach to Non-Scalable Solutions

In the world of startups, the advice from Paul Graham to “do things that don’t scale” is often cited for a good reason. Yet, when it comes to putting this philosophy into practice, especially in software development, the guidance tends to go unaddressed. After spending eight months developing my AI podcast platform, I have crafted a straightforward framework that aligns with this principle: every non-scalable approach is given a lifespan of three months. At the end of this period, we evaluate its effectiveness—transforming it into a robust solution or discontinuing it altogether.

The Startup Dilemma: The Pitfalls of Premature Scalability

As software engineers, there is a strong inclination to implement scalable solutions right from the beginning. We are trained to leverage sophisticated architecture like design patterns and microservices that can handle millions of users seamlessly. However, this often leads to a mindset focused on hypothetical growth rather than immediate needs—a common trap in startup environments where scalable code can end up being an expensive form of procrastination. My three-month rule compels me to write straightforward and even imperfect code that can be deployed quickly. This enables me to glean insights on user requirements in real-time.

My Practical Hacks: Rethinking Infrastructure Choices

Let’s delve into a few of the unconventional methods I’ve employed, along with the rationales behind them:

1. Consolidation on a Single VM

Currently, my entire infrastructure operates on a single $40/month virtual machine, hosting everything from the database to background jobs. While this may seem reckless, it has imparted invaluable lessons regarding my actual resource demands in a short time frame. Rather than preemptively establishing a complex Kubernetes setup, I’ve learned that my application’s peak usage only necessitates 4GB of RAM—a stark contrast to managing myriad empty containers.

2. Simplified Configuration Management

I maintain hardcoded constants throughout my codebase, such as pricing tiers and user limits. While this approach might appear primitive, it offers the convenience of easily searching and altering values without intricate configuration management systems. The time saved here is dramatic: three changes over three months required just minutes of redeployment, while building a comprehensive configuration service would have taken a week.

3. Utilizing SQLite for Production

In a surprising move, I opted for SQLite to power my multi-user web application. My database, a mere 47MB, manages up to

One Comment

  • Absolutely appreciate the pragmatic approach you’ve outlined—especially the emphasis on rapid iteration and real-world validation over premature optimization. The 3-month rule is a powerful reminder that simplicity and agility often lead to better understanding of actual user needs before investing heavily in scalable infrastructure. Your use of a single VM and SQLite exemplifies that sometimes, doing less smarter (in the short term) yields more insightful feedback. It also aligns well with the *build, measure, learn* cycle, encouraging startups and developers to prioritize learning and adaptation over spotless scalability early on. Looking forward to seeing how these insights evolve as your platform grows—thanks for sharing such a valuable perspective!

Leave a Reply to bdadmin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *