The 3-Month Experiment: A Fresh Approach to Non-Scalable Solutions in Development
In the realm of startup advice, Paul Graham’s mantra to “do things that don’t scale” often resonates with entrepreneurs and developers alike. While many embrace the concept, fewer delve into the practical implementation of this strategy, particularly in the field of coding.
After eight months of developing my AI podcast platform, I’ve devised a straightforward framework: any unscalable workaround is granted a trial period of three months. If it proves its worth, we elevate it to a refined solution; if not, it’s retired. This method isn’t merely about minimizing waste—it’s a calculated move to foster genuine learning during the development process.
The Challenge with Scalable Solutions
As engineers, we often approach projects with an emphasis on scalability from the ground up. We immerse ourselves in design patterns, microservices, and distributed systems—all tailored to manage extensive user bases. However, this mindset can lead to unnecessary complexity, especially in startups. Often, the need for scalable architecture translates into costly delays and premature optimization for users who may never materialize.
By adhering to my three-month rule, I compel myself to deploy straightforward, perhaps even imperfect code that quickly reveals the true needs of my users.
Current Infrastructure Hacks that Prove Useful
1. Consolidating on One Virtual Machine
I host everything—database, web server, background jobs, and caching—on a single $40/month virtual machine. While the lack of redundancy may seem reckless, this setup has dramatically increased my understanding of my resource requirements. In just two months, I discovered that my platform’s peak RAM usage is merely 4GB, thus avoiding the overengineering of complicated solutions like Kubernetes.
When issues arise (as they inevitably do), I gain insights into failure points that often surprise me.
2. Embracing Hardcoded Configurations
Instead of using configuration files or environment variables, I have constants directly embedded within my code, such as:
python
PRICE_TIER_1 = 9.99
PRICE_TIER_2 = 19.99
MAX_USERS = 100
AI_MODEL = "gpt-4"
This choice allows for rapid reference and change tracking through my git history, simplifying what would otherwise require extensive setup. In the last three months, I’ve altered these values only three times, saving significant development hours.
3. Utilizing SQLite for Database Needs
I opted
One Comment
Great insights! I appreciate how you emphasize the importance of practical experimentation over premature optimization. Your 3-month rule acts as an effective checkpoint that encourages rapid validation and learning, which is crucial in a startup environment where agility is key.
I’ve found that focusing on these quick-and-dirty solutions for initial stages often enables a deeper understanding of actual user needs before committing to scalable systems. For example, consolidating infrastructure on a single VM and using hardcoded configs might seem risky long-term, but as you point out, they provide invaluable insights early on.
It’s also a reminder that scalability considerations shouldn’t inhibit initial progress—sometimes, building simple, unrefined solutions allows for better-informed decisions down the line. Have you considered documenting the learnings or decision points during this 3-month window? It might help future iterations and team members understand why certain shortcuts were temporary rather than permanent solutions.