The Dynamics of Communication: A Comparison Between Business and STEM-Driven Environments
In the professional world, the educational background of individuals often shapes the culture and communication styles within organizations. Recently, I’ve observed a distinct pattern regarding how professionals from different disciplines approach business interactions, particularly when comparing those with business degrees to their counterparts in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).
My experiences stem from working in two organizations predominantly led by chemists and engineers. Interestingly, none of the managers or executives in these firms held business degrees. While I acknowledge the valuable technical insights these leaders brought to the table, the communication within these companies left much to be desired. There was an almost ritualistic adherence to formal communication, especially when it came to addressing superiors. Such a structure often resulted in convoluted exchanges that felt both contrived and unnecessarily stiff. Add to that the obsessive focus on dress codes and the frequent use of buzzwords like “synergy” and “value-added,” and it became clear why some referred to this dynamic as “business theater.”
In contrast, my previous roles in organizations primarily composed of professionals with business degrees demonstrated a markedly different atmosphere. Here, communication was fluid, direct, and pragmatic; interactions flowed more naturally, devoid of the rigid formalities observed in STEM-heavy environments. Colleagues—regardless of their position—participated in discussions as equals, which fostered a culture of openness and collaboration. There seemed to be a stronger emphasis on interpersonal skills, with many team members exhibiting empathy and sociability, qualities that often facilitate smoother teamwork.
While I don’t intend to generalize or suggest that those with STEM backgrounds lack social skills, my experiences have led me to believe that the training and environment fostered in business-focused education nurtures a different kind of engagement. In business-centric organizations, managers and executives feel more integrated into the team dynamic, nurturing a sense of camaraderie rather than authority. This results in a more approachable and supportive management style, making it easier for team members to voice their ideas or concerns.
Of course, this is based on personal observations and represents only a small sample of the vast corporate landscape, but I am curious to hear if others have encountered similar trends or perhaps even the opposite. How do educational backgrounds influence workplace communication and culture in your experiences? Let’s discuss in the comments!
One Comment
Thank you for sharing these thoughtful insights. Your observations highlight an important aspect of organizational culture: how educational backgrounds shape communication styles and workplace dynamics. It’s interesting to see how those with business degrees often prioritize interpersonal skills, adaptability, and informal rapport-building, which can foster a more collaborative environment. Conversely, STEM environments tend to emphasize precision, formal procedures, and technical rigor, sometimes at the expense of looseness in communication.
That said, I believe the key lies in balancing both approaches. Effective leadership, regardless of background, benefits from technical expertise combined with strong soft skills. Encouraging cross-disciplinary training or communication workshops could help bridge these differences—promoting clarity, authenticity, and team cohesion across various organizational contexts. Ultimately, fostering environments where diverse skills and communication styles are recognized and valued can lead to more innovative and resilient organizations. Would love to hear others’ perspectives on how integrating these approaches might enhance workplace culture!