Home / Business / Controversial Opinion: The Majority of Companies Shouldn’t Rely on AI for Customer Support (Variation 27)

Controversial Opinion: The Majority of Companies Shouldn’t Rely on AI for Customer Support (Variation 27)

Rethinking AI in Customer Service: Why Not All Businesses Should Embrace It

In the rapidly evolving landscape of technology, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a buzzword, particularly in customer service. However, after working with numerous clients through my voice AI company, I often find myself advising potential customers against adopting AI, much to the chagrin of my sales team. The reason? When AI is thrust into environments where it doesn’t fit, it tends to create more challenges than solutions.

Recently, a law firm approached us, eager to employ AI for their client intake calls. Upon reviewing their call recordings, it became obvious that their situation was not suited for an AI solution. Their intake process involved intricate legal inquiries, emotionally charged narratives from clients, and detailed eligibility checks. The introduction of AI in such a context would likely have resulted in chaos rather than clarity.

This mismatch between AI capabilities and business needs is more common than one might think. The current hype surrounding AI has led many organizations to believe that they need an AI solution immediately, without fully grasping its appropriate applications. The reality is that AI excels in certain scenarios but can falter dramatically in others.

If your business is considering adopting voice AI, there are three critical criteria you must evaluate beforehand:

1. Predictable Call Patterns

A comprehensive analysis of over 10,000 customer calls reveals that some businesses experience up to 80% of their inquiries stemming from a small set of common questions. These include appointment bookings, standard FAQs, updates, and basic troubleshooting—situations well-suited for AI intervention.

Conversely, if your call volume consists largely of unique conversations, it may be time to reconsider. For instance, a mental health clinic we assessed struggled with entirely individualized calls, each requiring sensitive handling and a personal touch. In their case, AI would have only injected confusion and frustration.

To assist businesses in this evaluation, we’ve developed a call pattern analysis tool. If less than 70% of your calls exhibit recognizable patterns, AI may not be the right fit. For example, one home services firm discovered that 85% of their interactions were related to scheduling appointments, positioning them as ideal candidates for AI. Meanwhile, a B2B company found only 30% of their calls fit recognizable patterns—a clear signal to maintain human operators.

2. Defined Escalation Triggers

For AI to function effectively, it must be paired with clear protocols for escalation. One company implemented a chatbot

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *