Home / Business / The 3-Month Rule: My Technical Framework for Doing Things That Don’t Scale

The 3-Month Rule: My Technical Framework for Doing Things That Don’t Scale

Embracing the Unscalable: A 3-Month Framework for Rapid Learning in Software Development

In the world of technology and entrepreneurship, the concept of “doing things that don’t scale” is a familiar one, first popularized by Paul Graham. While many discuss the philosophy behind it, few delve into the practical implementation, particularly in software development. After dedicating eight months to building my AI podcast platform, I’ve crafted a straightforward approach: each unscalable tactic is allowed a lifespan of three months. After this period, we assess whether the approach is worth formalizing or if it should be discarded.

As developers, we’re often conditioned to prioritize scalable solutions from the outset, envisioning architectures equipped to handle expansive user bases. Yet, in the startup arena, focusing on scalability too soon can lead to costly procrastination. You’re effectively engineering solutions for hypothetical users. My three-month guideline compels me to create simple, efficient, and sometimes less-than-perfect code that gets deployed, allowing me to gain real insights into user needs quickly.

Innovative Infrastructure Approaches

Let’s explore how I’ve structured my current infrastructure and the rationale behind these seemingly unconventional choices:

1. Single Virtual Machine Deployment

For just $40 a month, my entire setup—including the database, web server, and job processing—runs on one virtual machine (VM). This lack of redundancy might seem risky, but it provides invaluable insights. Within two months, I’ve gathered more data regarding my resource needs than any planning document could offer. It turns out my AI-driven platform peaks at 4GB RAM, revealing that the complicated Kubernetes architecture I nearly implemented would have been needlessly managing idle containers. Each crash offers practical learning opportunities about real bottlenecks that I could not have predicted.

2. Directly Hardcoded Configuration

Instead of utilizing external configuration files, I’ve chosen to embed constants throughout my codebase. While this might seem limiting—requiring redeploying for every change—it has its advantages. I can search through my entire codebase to track price changes in seconds, and any updates are backed by git’s meticulous history. Over three months, these values have changed only three times, justifying the rewards of this approach against the time it would have taken to develop a comprehensive configuration service.

3. SQLite for Production

Running a multi-user web application on SQLite may raise eyebrows, but my 47MB database handles 50 concurrent users seamlessly. My observation of access patterns revealed that my usage

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *