Home / Business / The 3-Month Rule: My Technical Framework for Doing Things That Don’t Scale

The 3-Month Rule: My Technical Framework for Doing Things That Don’t Scale

Title: Embracing the 3-Month Rule: A Pragmatic Approach to Building Scalable Solutions in Startups

When it comes to startup development, the advice from Paul Graham to “do things that don’t scale” is often quoted, but the practical implementation of this philosophy in coding remains less discussed. Having spent the last eight months crafting my AI podcast platform, I’ve devised a straightforward framework that encourages experimentation: I give every unscalable workaround a lifespan of three months. After this period, the solution must either prove its worth and evolve into a robust build or be abandoned.

As developers, we often feel the pressure to create scalable solutions from the outset, embracing complex design patterns and architecting systems capable of handling vast numbers of users. However, this mindset can lead to inefficient procrastination, particularly in the early stages of a startup. The three-month rule compels me to focus on delivering simple, functional code, allowing me to gain insight into user needs and preferences.

Here’s a Look at My Current Infrastructure Strategies and the Reasons Behind Their Effectiveness:

1. Consolidation on a Single Virtual Machine

My platform operates entirely on a single $40/month VM, hosting everything from the database to the web server and background jobs. While this setup lacks redundancy and requires manual backups, it has provided invaluable insights into my resource requirements far beyond what any capacity planning document could offer. I’ve learned that my “AI-heavy” platform only peaks at 4GB RAM and dodged the time-consuming setup of a Kubernetes environment, which would have overloaded me with unnecessary management tasks.

2. Simplicity with Hardcoded Configurations

I have opted for straightforward hardcoding of configuration values directly in the code, rather than utilizing configuration files or environment variables. While this method may not align with best practices, it has allowed me to quickly access and modify values without the overhead of a dedicated configuration service. Every secondary change I’ve needed has required just a quick redeployment, saving countless engineering hours.

3. Efficient Use of SQLite in Production

While unconventional, I have chosen SQLite as the database for my multi-user application. With a compact 47MB size, it efficiently supports up to 50 concurrent users. This decision has spotlighted my access patterns, revealing a predominantly read-heavy usage which is perfectly suited for SQLite—thus averting unnecessary optimization concerns that would arise from a more complex database setup like Postgres.

4. Streamlined Deployment Process

My deployment process is

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *