Home / Business / Small Businesses in the UK / Naming and shaming invoice defaulters

Naming and shaming invoice defaulters

How to Handle Persistent Invoice Non-Payment: Strategies and Considerations

Dealing with long-standing unpaid invoices can be a challenging experience for business owners. When efforts to collect overdue payments through direct communication and legal channels prove unsuccessful, it can leave entrepreneurs feeling frustrated and seeking alternative solutions. Recently, a case surfaced involving a UK-based business that failed to settle invoices for over four months, despite repeated attempts and legal proceedings. This situation highlights common dilemmas faced by many in similar circumstances.

Background of the Case

In this instance, the service provider delivered a satisfactory service, with no prior indication of dissatisfaction or issues raised by the client. The client explicitly requested and used the services, yet only agreed to pay half of the invoiced amount, despite not formally disputing the work or expressing concerns. Multiple efforts to negotiate a settlement were unsuccessful, leading the service provider to initiate legal action. However, the court process is inherently slow, with a waiting period that could extend several months before resolution.

Key Challenges

  • Delayed Enforcement: Court proceedings often take considerable time, leaving small business owners awaiting resolution while ongoing expenses accrue.

  • Client Non-Compliance: The lack of responsiveness and partial payment attempts undermine trust and complicate recovery efforts.

  • Reputation and Public Perception: Considering whether to publicly disclose the client’s non-payment status raises questions about potential reputational impacts and legal repercussions.

Considering a Public Approach

Some business owners contemplate “naming and shaming” as a means to pressure the client into paying. Platforms like LinkedIn or other social media channels are often considered for this purpose. While public accountability can sometimes expedite resolution, it also carries risks:

  • Legal Risks: Making public accusations without concrete evidence can lead to defamation claims.

  • Reputational Damage: There is a potential for the service provider to appear confrontational or unprofessional, possibly affecting future business opportunities.

  • Retaliation and Online Reputation: The client may respond with negative comments or reviews, which could harm the provider’s public image.

Practical Recommendations

  1. Legal Clarity: Continue to follow the court process diligently. Court judgments are based on verified evidence, making them a more secure route for recovery.

  2. Documentation: Keep detailed records of all communications, invoices, and attempts to resolve the issue. These can strengthen your case should legal action proceed.

  3. Professional Communication: If considering public disclosure, seek legal advice to ensure statements are accurate and appropriately worded. Focus on factual

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *