Home / Business / The 3-Month Rule: My Technical Framework for Doing Things That Don’t Scale Variation 9

The 3-Month Rule: My Technical Framework for Doing Things That Don’t Scale Variation 9

The 3-Month Experiment: Crafting Practical Solutions in Software Development

In the world of startups, the prevailing wisdom often echoes Paul Graham’s guidance to “do things that don’t scale.” However, translating this advice into concrete coding practices remains a lesser-explored territory. After dedicating the past eight months to developing my AI podcast platform, I formulated a straightforward approach: every non-scalable solution receives a three-month trial period. If it demonstrates its worth within this timeframe, it transitions to a robust implementation; if not, it’s time for it to go.

As software engineers, we’re conditioned to prioritize scalability from the outset—think microservices, advanced architecture, and distributed systems. But in a startup environment, investing effort into scalable solutions early on can often result in unnecessary delays. We may find ourselves optimizing for hypothetical users and managing challenges that may never arise. My three-month rule compels me to produce simpler code that enables rapid deployment and offers genuine insights into user needs.

My Current Infrastructure Hacks: Smart Choices in a Learning Environment

1. Consolidated Resources: A Single Virtual Machine

I operate my entire stack—including the database, web server, and background services—on a single $40-per-month virtual machine. This setup has no redundancy and relies on manual backups to my local device.

Why is this a smart choice? Over the last two months, I’ve gained invaluable insights into my actual resource requirements—far beyond what any planning document could provide. My “AI-heavy” application typically utilizes only 4GB of RAM. The complex Kubernetes architecture I nearly implemented would have resulted in maintaining unused containers.

When my VM has crashed (twice so far), I learned precisely what led to failure, which consistently has been unexpected issues.

2. Simplified Configuration Management

In my code, configuration values like pricing and max users are hardcoded directly within the files:

python
PRICE_TIER_1 = 9.99
PRICE_TIER_2 = 19.99
MAX_USERS = 100
AI_MODEL = "gpt-4"

I don’t use external configuration files or environment variables, meaning any modifications require redeploying the application. The benefit? I can quickly search the entire codebase for any configuration item. Changes to prices are easily monitored in git history, and each update undergoes a code review—conducted by me.

Creating a dedicated configuration service would take a week. In the past three

One Comment

  • Thank you for sharing such a practical and insightful approach to balancing quick iteration with the realities of startup development. Your “3-month rule” effectively reminds us that the pursuit of perfect scalability shouldn’t hinder timely learning and user feedback—especially in early stages where assumptions often prove invalid.

    I also appreciate your emphasis on simplicity—using a single VM and hardcoded configs intentionally to reduce complexity during initial experimentation. This reminds me of the importance of minimizing friction so that rapid development and introspection can occur without getting bogged down by infrastructure overengineering.

    One point to consider moving forward is gradually introducing modularity or abstracted configuration management as your product stabilizes. While hardcoded settings are great for speed, establishing structured configuration workflows can help when scaling or when onboarding new team members.

    Overall, your framework exemplifies the value of strategic trade-offs based on your current goals—embracing simplicity early, but with a mindful eye towards evolution. Looking forward to seeing how this approach scales as your project grows!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *