Home / Business / The 3-Month Rule: My Technical Framework for Doing Things That Don’t Scale Variation 884

The 3-Month Rule: My Technical Framework for Doing Things That Don’t Scale Variation 884

Title: Embracing the 3-Month Rule: A Framework for Learning in startup Development

In the realm of startup growth, the advice from esteemed entrepreneur Paul Graham often resonates: “Do things that don’t scale.” However, there’s a lack of guidance on translating this philosophy into the technical side of development. After eight months of building my AI podcast platform, I have devised a straightforward approach that I call the 3-Month Rule. This strategy gives any unscalable hack a trial period of three months, post which it either proves its worth and gets developed into a robust solution or it gets scrapped.

As developers, our instinct often pushes us toward creating scalable solutions right from the start. We become enamored with design patterns, microservices, and complex system architectures—engineering marvels that promise to support millions of users. However, this kind of thinking tends to dominate in larger companies, while in a startup environment, pursuing scalability prematurely can be a costly delay. Rather than optimizing for non-existent users, my 3-Month Rule prompts me to embrace simple, pragmatic coding that allows me to ship quickly and understand what users truly need.

My Current Infrastructure Hacks: A Strategic Overview

1. Single VM Operation

I’ve consolidated all my operations—database, web server, background jobs, and Redis—onto one economical $40/month virtual machine. There’s no redundancy or automated backups. While this may seem reckless, it has been revealing: in just two months, I’ve grasped my actual resource requirements far better than I could have with any traditional capacity planning. My platform consistently peaks at 4GB of RAM, leading me to realize that my anticipated Kubernetes setup would have likely just amounted to managing underutilized containers. When crashes do occur (and they have, twice), they offer valuable insights into real failure points, which often surprise me.

2. Hardcoded Configuration

Instead of utilizing configuration files or environment variables, I’ve opted for hardcoded constants sprinkled throughout my code:

python
PRICE_TIER_1 = 9.99
PRICE_TIER_2 = 19.99
MAX_USERS = 100
AI_MODEL = "gpt-4"

This method simplifies tracking changes in my Git history. Each modification necessitates a quick redeployment, saving me from investing significant engineering hours in creating a dedicated configuration service. Over the last three months, I’ve made only three changes, translating to about 15 minutes

One Comment

  • Thank you for sharing such a practical and insightful approach to balancing quick iteration with strategic development. The 3-Month Rule effectively acknowledges that in the early stages of a startup, speed and learning often outweigh perfect scalability. Your emphasis on using simple, merged infrastructure and hardcoded configurations as tools for rapid experimentation resonates with the “build fast, fail fast” philosophy.

    One enhancement to consider might be implementing lightweight monitoring or logging during these initial phases. Even simple tools like manual logs or basic metrics can provide further clarity about resource usage and user behavior, informing future scalability decisions without adding much overhead.

    Ultimately, your framework champions the idea that understanding your core needs and user interactions should guide technical choices, rather than adherence to overly complex architectures from the outset. Looking forward to seeing how your platform evolves as these initial insights shape more scalable solutions over time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *