Embracing the 3-Month Rule: A Pragmatic Approach to Unscalable Solutions in Tech Development
In the tech world, advice such as “do things that don’t scale” is often repeated, yet practical implementation remains elusive. My journey over the last eight months while building an AI podcast platform has led me to develop a straightforward framework: each unscalable hack has a lifespan of three months. After this period, I assess whether it has proven its worth and deserves a more robust implementation—or if it’s time to let it go.
As developers, we’re ingrained with the concept of creating scalable architectures from the outset—think design patterns, microservices, and distributed systems. While these are invaluable for large organizations, they can become counterproductive in the startup realm, where early-stage efficiency often trumps theoretical scalability. My three-month guideline encourages me to adopt an approach focused on straightforward, albeit ‘imperfect,’ coding that yields tangible insights into user needs.
Leveraging My Current Technical Framework: Smart Infrastructure Hacks
-
Single VM Deployment
I operate everything—database, web server, and even background jobs—on a singular VM costing just $40 per month. Although this approach lacks redundancy and involves manually backing up data, it has granted me essential insights into my platform’s true resource requirements. In just two months, I’ve identified that my AI-oriented platform peaks at 4GB of RAM. The complex setup of Kubernetes that I initially considered would have been an exercise in managing idle resources. Indeed, when my system has gone down (which has happened twice), the aftermath has provided valuable data on unexpected failure points. -
Hardcoded Configurations
Rather than employing configuration files or environment variables, I’ve opted to use hardcoded constants scattered throughout the code. For instance:
python
PRICE_TIER_1 = 9.99
PRICE_TIER_2 = 19.99
MAX_USERS = 100
AI_MODEL = "gpt-4"
This method simplifies value tracking and redeployment—each price adjustment can be monitored through version history, and any necessary updates require merely a brief redeployment. My experience shows that a configuration service would consume unnecessary time and resources, given that I’ve only needed to alter settings three times in three months, amounting to a mere 15 minutes of work rather than the 40 hours it could have taken.
3.
One Comment
Great insights on adopting a pragmatic, time-bound approach to unscalable solutions—it’s a refreshing reminder that agility often trumps perfection in early-stage development. The 3-month rule essentially acts as a natural filter, helping founders and developers avoid overinvesting in premature scalability efforts that may not align with current needs. Your example of deploying on a single VM to gain real-world resource insights is a perfect illustration of how less-than-ideal infrastructure can accelerate learning.
I would add that this mindset also encourages a culture of continuous iteration and validation, which is vital for startups navigating uncertain terrain. Additionally, your approach to hardcoded configurations emphasizes the importance of simplicity and speed, especially when the overhead of managing environment-specific settings outweighs potential benefits at this stage.
It might be worth considering that as your platform matures, gradually refactoring these elements toward more scalable and flexible solutions—guided by your 3-month evaluations—can ensure your architecture evolves in tandem with user growth. Overall, this framework fosters a disciplined yet flexible mindset that balances speed, learning, and future scalability. Thanks for sharing this practical perspective!