Home / Business / The 3-Month Rule: My Technical Framework for Doing Things That Don’t Scale Variation 601

The 3-Month Rule: My Technical Framework for Doing Things That Don’t Scale Variation 601

The Three-Month Experiment: A Pragmatic Approach to Unscalable Solutions in Software Development

In the realm of entrepreneurship and startup culture, the advice from renowned investor Paul Graham echoes repeatedly: “Do things that don’t scale.” Yet, when it comes to applying this philosophy within the technical confines of coding, the conversation often remains uncharted. After eight months of developing my AI podcast platform, I’ve adopted a straightforward principle: every unscalable technique or workaround is given a lifespan of three months. At the end of that period, it must either demonstrate its value and be refined or be discarded entirely.

As software engineers, we are often conditioned to prioritize scalability from the outset. We think in terms of design patterns, microservices, and distributed architectures—all aimed at accommodating vast user bases. However, this mindset frequently leads to unnecessary complexities in a startup environment, where scalable solutions can transform into costly procrastination. Why spend time refining features for potential users who have yet to materialize? My three-month rule compels me to craft straightforward, albeit imperfect, code that can be delivered swiftly, providing invaluable insights into actual user needs.

Current Infrastructure Innovations: Simplifying for Learning

1. Consolidating Resources on a Single VM

My entire operational setup—encompassing the database, web server, background jobs, and Redis—works seamlessly on a single $40/month virtual machine with no backup redundancy. While some may view this as reckless, it has been a revelation. In just a couple of months, I gained more understanding about my resource consumption than any planning document could offer. Surprisingly, my platform’s peak usage only requires about 4GB of RAM. The elaborate Kubernetes system I almost implemented would have been wasted resources managing empty containers. By experiencing real crashes, I uncovered unexpected weaknesses in my infrastructure, paving the way for strategic improvements.

2. Embracing Hardcoded Configurations

Instead of utilizing configuration files or environment variables, I have hardcoded constants throughout my codebase. Changes necessitate a redeployment, which may seem labor-intensive. Ironically, this approach has become a powerful asset because it allows me to facilitate quick searches across my codebase for any configuration. Each price revision is meticulously tracked in version control, with each update undergoing code review—even if it’s just by myself! The time-saving aspect of this method far outweighs the effort it would take to create a dedicated configuration service.

3. Using SQLite for Concurrent Users

Yes, I opted for SQLite

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *