The 3-Month Rule: A Pragmatic Framework for Unscalable Development
In the world of startup development, the conventional wisdom is often expressed in Paul Graham’s phrase: “Do things that don’t scale.” However, implementing this approach—particularly in coding—can seem elusive. After eight months of building my AI podcast platform, I’ve established a pragmatic framework that I call the 3-Month Rule. This guideline dictates that every unscalable approach I implement will be given a trial period of three months. At the end of this time, it either proves its worth and is refined, or it’s discarded.
The Challenge of Scaling Early
As engineers, we’re trained to prioritize the building of scalable solutions from the outset. We focus on intricate design patterns, microservices, and distributed systems that are capable of accommodating millions of users. However, this mindset often reflects the thinking of larger organizations. In a startup environment, striving for scalability too soon can lead to unnecessary complexities—essentially a form of procrastination. My 3-month rule compels me to prioritize simplicity and directness over theoretical perfection, allowing me to ship code that reveals genuine user needs.
Current Infrastructure Hacks: Smart Choices for Learning
Here are some of the unconventional strategies I’ve employed, which may seem unorthodox but have proven to be valuable learning tools:
1. Unified VM Setup
My entire platform—including the database, web server, background jobs, and caching—operates on a single $40/month virtual machine. There’s no redundancy, and I execute manual backups.
Why is this effective? I’ve gained insights into my actual resource requirements over the past couple of months that no detailed capacity-planning document could provide. Surprisingly, my “AI-loaded” platform has only peaked at 4GB of RAM usage. Had I launched with a complex Kubernetes configuration, I would have been managing idle containers instead of focusing on real-world needs.
2. Simplified Configuration Management
Instead of using configuration files or environmental variables, I’ve hardcoded values directly into the code:
python
PRICE_TIER_1 = 9.99
PRICE_TIER_2 = 19.99
MAX_USERS = 100
AI_MODEL = "gpt-4"
Though this means deployments require a little more effort, it brings a hidden advantage: I can quickly search my codebase and track changes through Git history. In three months, I’ve made only three
One Comment
This post offers a compelling perspective on balancing rapid iteration with pragmatic resource management, especially in the early stages of startup development. The 3-Month Rule is a powerful heuristic—it encourages founders and developers to test unscalable approaches rigorously without over-engineering prematurely. I particularly appreciate the emphasis on gaining real-world insights rather than relying solely on theoretical scalability plans.
Your example of using a unified VM setup underscores the value of simplicity—by observing actual resource needs, you’re avoiding unnecessary complexity and focusing on what truly matters: delivering value and learning as you go. This aligns well with the broader principle that it’s often better to have a working core rather than a perfectly scalable but overengineered system that might never be fully utilized in early phases.
One consideration I’d add is the importance of documenting these experiments and their outcomes. Over time, maintaining a clear record of what approaches worked, what didn’t, and why can be invaluable when you decide to scale. Additionally, as your user base grows, continuously revisiting and refining this framework will ensure that your infrastructure evolves in ways that support sustainable growth.
Overall, embracing unscalable practices temporarily—while maintaining a disciplined review cycle—seems like a prudent way to iterate efficiently and adapt swiftly. Thanks for sharing this nuanced approach!