Home / Business / The 3-Month Rule: My Technical Framework for Doing Things That Don’t Scale

The 3-Month Rule: My Technical Framework for Doing Things That Don’t Scale

Embracing the 3-Month Rule: A Pragmatic Approach to Coding in Startups

In the tech world, the advice from Paul Graham to “do things that don’t scale” is a well-known mantra. However, the conversation often glosses over the practical implementation of this principle in the realm of coding. After spending eight months creating my AI podcast platform, I’ve devised a straightforward strategy: every unscalable workaround is given a lifespan of just three months. At the end of this period, each hack must either demonstrate its value and be properly integrated or be discarded.

Why startups Need a Different Approach

As engineers, we are typically conditioned to design for scalability from the outset. Terms like design patterns, microservices, and distributed systems often dominate our thinking. While these concepts are invaluable, they primarily cater to the challenges faced by larger organizations. In a startup environment, focusing on scalability prematurely can lead to wasted resources, as you’re building solutions for users that might not even exist yet. By adhering to my three-month rule, I focus on producing straightforward code that prioritizes immediate user needs and allows me to learn quickly.

My Practical Infrastructure Strategies

Here are some of the unconventional methods I’m using right now, which I believe are quite effective:

1. Consolidated Operations on a Single VM

All my platform components—database, web server, background jobs, and Redis—operate on a single $40/month virtual machine. This means zero redundancy and manual backups to my local system.

What’s the rationale behind this? I’ve gained insight into my actual resource requirements in two months, far surpassing what any theoretical capacity planning could offer. It turns out my resource usage is far less complex than anticipated. When the VM crashes—and it has twice—I receive valuable data about the real failure points, which often surprise me.

2. Hardcoded Configurations

I store configuration values as simple constants in the codebase:

python
PRICE_TIER_1 = 9.99
PRICE_TIER_2 = 19.99
MAX_USERS = 100
AI_MODEL = "gpt-4"

No config files or environmental variables are used. When changes are necessary, redeployment is required.

The benefit of this approach? I can quickly search my entire codebase for any configuration value and maintain a change history in version control. This method has resulted in significant time savings, allowing me to focus on immediate adjustments rather than building out

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *