Home / Business / SMEs / We rehired a restaurant’s staff to keep them employed — now we’re being hit with back unemployment taxes

We rehired a restaurant’s staff to keep them employed — now we’re being hit with back unemployment taxes

Navigating Unemployment Tax Challenges: Our Experience as New Restaurant Owners

In July 2023, my spouse and I embarked on an exciting yet daunting journey by purchasing a restaurant in Oregon. Investing our life savings, we aimed to create a small business that would serve as a pillar in our community, offering more than just culinary delights but also a sense of belonging and support.

Upon taking over, we discovered that the previous owner had terminated all the restaurant staff. Despite being newcomers to the industry, we made a decision driven by a sense of responsibility and compassion — to rehire the original team. Many of these individuals had families relying on them, and they possessed the expertise to keep the restaurant running smoothly. This decision, albeit noble, has unexpectedly led us into a tricky situation.

A few months into operation, we were surprised to learn that we’re facing substantial back unemployment taxes resulting from our choice to reinstate the prior employees. An official from the employment department informed us that had we opted to assemble an entirely new team, our business, categorized as new, would likely have benefited from a reduced tax rate. Instead, by bringing back the original staff, we’re now subjected to the existing tax rate and owe nearly $10,000 in back taxes.

In a conversation with a compliance specialist, it was conveyed that an appeal might not yield much relief, though they clarified their lack of legal expertise. The situation was presented as though we had little recourse, leaving us feeling cornered.

For a small business like ours, this financial burden is significant. To date, we haven’t drawn salaries; instead, we’re sustaining the business and our dedicated staff by dipping into personal savings. This unforeseen expense feels like a penalty for making a conscientious choice to support our community and employees.

We’re not seeking charity, just equity. It’s disheartening to see how the system appears to chastise small business owners for prioritizing job retention. Such hurdles perhaps explain why many small enterprises struggle to thrive or even survive.

To our fellow entrepreneurs, have any of you encountered a similar predicament? Have you pursued an appeal, consulted with legislators, or engaged in other avenues of recourse? We’d deeply appreciate your insights, guidance, or even just an acknowledgment that our sense of injustice isn’t misplaced.

Summary: As new restaurant owners in Oregon, we rehired the previous staff to keep them employed, only to face significant back taxes due to the tax rate attached to these rehired roles. We feel unjustly burden

One Comment

  • Thank you for sharing your experience—it’s a compelling example of how well-intentioned decisions can lead to unforeseen challenges in the small business landscape. Your commitment to your staff and community is admirable, and it highlights the importance of understanding the nuances of employment and tax policies when making staffing decisions.

    This situation underscores a common challenge: the distinction between new and existing employment relationships can significantly impact tax obligations, yet many entrepreneurs may not be fully aware of these implications until it’s too late. It might be worthwhile to consult with a specialized employment tax attorney or a CPA familiar with Oregon’s specific regulations, as there could be potential strategies to mitigate back taxes or prevent similar issues in the future.

    Additionally, reaching out to local small business associations or legislative representatives to advocate for clearer guidelines or relief programs for small businesses facing such circumstances could be impactful. Your proactive engagement and transparency can also raise awareness within the small business community, potentially prompting policy discussions around more equitable tax treatment for small, community-focused enterprises.

    Wishing you the best as you navigate this situation—your perseverance and commitment are truly inspiring.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *